Litigation News
Supreme Court disapproves of High Courts' interference with deposit orders passed under Arbitration Act
Interference with orders of arbitral tribunals by exercising jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should be only in cases of exceptional rarity, the Court underscored.
The Supreme Court noted with disapproval the trend of High Courts to exercise jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to interfere with deposit orders made by arbitral tribunals under the Arbitration Act (Navayuga Engineering Company v. Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation).