TATA v Mistry: What is wrong in head of family wanting a say in the company's affairs? Supreme Court asks [LIVE UPDATES]

A Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde is hearing the matter.
TATA v Mistry: What is wrong in head of family wanting a say in the company's affairs? Supreme Court asks [LIVE UPDATES]
Tata v Mistry

The Supreme Court has started final hearings in the dispute between Tata Group’s holding company, Tata Sons Limited and Shapoorji Pallonji Groups’ Cyrus Mistry.

Both Tata Sons and Mistry have challenged a December 18, 2019 order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal which had ordered the reinstatement of Cyrus Mistry as the Chairperson of Tata Sons Limited.

The Supreme Court had on January 10, 2020, stayed the NCLAT order. The NCLAT, in its December 2019 judgment, had held that the proceedings of the Board meeting of Tata Sons held on October 24, 2016, removing Cyrus Mistry as Chairperson was illegal.

It had also directed that Ratan Tata should not take any decision in advance which requires majority decision of the Board of Directors of Tata Sons or a majority in the Annual General Meeting.

Live updates of the hearing today feature here.

To read an account of Day 1, click here. To read more on the hearing on Day 2, click here and for the Day 3 hearing, click here.

Subscribe now to get unlimited access

We're glad you're enjoying Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Login and subscribe to continue reading this story.

Already a user? Login
No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com