Supreme Court sustains Medha Patkar's conviction for defaming Delhi LG VK Saxena

However, the Court set aside the penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed on the Narmada Bachao Andolan activist.
Medha Patkar, VK Saxena and Supreme Court
Medha Patkar, VK Saxena and Supreme Court
Published on
2 min read

The Supreme Court on Monday sustained social activist Medha Patkar's conviction in a defamation case filed by Delhi Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena in 2000.

However, a Bench of Justices MM Sundresh and NK Singh waived the penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed on her.

Justice MM Sundresh and Justice N Kotiswar Singh
Justice MM Sundresh and Justice N Kotiswar Singh

Saxena, who was once the President of the National Council of Civil Liberties, had in 2000 published an advertisement against Patkar's Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), the movement that opposed the construction of dams on the Narmada River.

The advertisement was titled ‘True face of Ms. Medha Patkar and her Narmada Bachao Andolan’.

Following the publication of the advertisement, Patkar issued a press notice against Saxena, alleging that he had visited Malegaon, praised the NBA and paid ₹40,000 through a cheque to Lok Samiti for Narmada Bachao Andolan. It also said that the cheque, which came from Lalbhai Group, had bounced.

The reporting of the press note led Saxena to file a defamation suit against Patkar before a court in Ahmedabad in 2001. The case was transferred to Delhi in 2003 on orders of the Supreme Court.

In May-July 2024, Patkar was held guilty in the case and the magistrate court sentenced her to five months of jail and ordered her to pay ₹10 lakh compensation to Saxena. 

The revisional court upheld the magistrate court's verdict convicting Patkar.

However, it modified the punishment and released Patkar on probation on furnishing a probation bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the like amount for one year from the date of furnishing the probation bond and, subject to her depositing a compensation amount of ₹1 lakh instead of ₹10 lakh.

She then moved the High Court against her conviction.

The Delhi High Court also upheld the conviction, but modified the condition of probation, requiring her to appear before the trial court every three months.

Justice Shalinder Kaur said Patkar can appear online or be represented by an advocate.

She then moved the top court against the same.

Senior Advocate Sanjay Parikh argued the case for Medha Patkar.

Senior Advocate Maninder Singh, along with advocates Gajinder Kumar, Kiran Jai and Somya appeared for VK Saxena. Saxena

Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com