Search Results

The Court found that the 11-year delay in filing the complaint was unexplained and held that continuing the proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

The Court noted that the accused and the victim's family have reached an understanding that the possibility of marriage would be considered once the victim attains the legally prescribed age.

The Court held that the allegations did not establish that the petitioner had kept the snake in captivity, killed or injured it or uploaded its photographs on social media.

The case involves allegations that Razorpay failed to conduct proper KYC and facilitated the operation of a network of Chinese-controlled digital loan apps that engaged in unethical money recovery pra ...

The Court was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to curb flashy signboards that could distract drivers and result into accidents.

Remanding the case back to family court, the High Court said reasons for directing the test would have to be recorded, as per Supreme Court principles.

The Court, however, clarified that a woman’s matrimonial history, irrespective of the number of marriages, cannot by itself be a ground to disbelieve allegations of criminal wrongdoing.

The Court said that the ED could not file a private complaint and initiate subsequent PMLA proceedings for the same.

The Court quashed a sexual harassment case filed against a man on finding that the complainant later disowned most of her allegations, with the only remaining claim being that he looked at her inappro ...

The Court found that the complaint was filed as a counterblast after Krishna accused the official of being involved in the theft of saris from a local temple.

The Court termed a plea to quash the chargesheet filed in the case a “gross abuse of the process of the Court” and directed the petitioner-accused to pay ₹25,000 as costs to the Mysuru DLSA.

Legal opinions given by panel advocates are only advisory in nature and cannot replace an authority's independent decision-making process, the Court said.

"Permitting further trial in the case at hand would become an abuse of the process of law and result in miscarriage of justice," the Court held.

State cites financial constraints and administrative exigencies to oppose PIL seeking ₹5,000 crore in arrears for 1.26 crore women.

Justice M Nagaprasanna allowed petitions filed by KPCC, DK Shivakumar and Siddaramaiah.

Police personnel should immediately stop such activities inside the police station, the bench underscored.