Search Results

The Court held that a woman who is misled into believing she is married can pursue a cruelty case against her partner, even if the relationship is not legally recognised as a marriage.

The Court overturned a 2022 single-judge order that had restrained Classic Legends from using the 'Yezdi' mark after the official liquidator of the mark's first owner, Ideal Jawa, claimed rights over ...

The Court held that the Civil Rights Enforcement Cell can investigate caste claims only when the District Caste Verification Committee makes a formal reference to it.

The matter relates to a cheating case filed in 2022, wherein a man claimed that he had used PhonePe to make multiple deposits of money with a sports betting website.

The polls were earlier deferred by the Electoral Officer citing a court injunction and lack of clarity from the Managing Committee.

The judicial commission report held that event management house DNA Entertainment Networks and its officials were among those responsible for the June 4 Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede.

Thimarodi is an activist known for being vocal about the Justice for Sowjanya movement. He is also alleged to have given shelter to a sanitation worker who had made allegations about Dharmasthala buri ...

According to X Corp, its compliance record contradicts a High Court single- judge's conclusion in his September 24 verdict that the platform intends to disregard Indian law.

Senior Sidharth Advocate Luthra added that Revanna was not meaningfully heard before the trial court imposed the maximum penalty possible on him.

A single judge Bench of the Court had earlier opined that X Corp cannot claim violation of free speech under Article 19 of the Constitution in the matter, since this right is available only to Indian ...

The Court has ordered the Karnataka government to place on record a comprehensive status report on measures in place for persons with disabilities within six weeks

Justice S Rachaiah set aside a trial court order that had earlier acquitted the editor, T Gururaj, in the defamation case filed by retired police officer, SN Suresh Babu.

The Court, however, said that Yediyurappa’s personal appearance should not be insisted upon during the course of the trial, unless necessary.

The submission was made by Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty before Justice MGM Kamal who was hearing a plea moved by RSS Kalaburagi District Convenor Ashok Patil seeking permission for the march.

A Bench of Justices DK Singh and Tara Vitasta Ganju reserved its judgment in the matter on Wednesday.

The Court quashed two State government notifications which had declared BMRCL services as public utility and essential service.