Corporate & In-House News

Dishi Bhomawat joins Touchstone Partners as Counsel in Mumbai

Bhomawat, a London-trained corporate lawyer, brings with her eight years of experience advising on strategic, cross-border mergers and acquisitions among others.

Bar & Bench

Touchstone Partners has announced the appointment of Dishi Bhomawat as Counsel in its Mumbai office.

Bhomawat, a London-trained corporate lawyer, brings with her eight years of experience advising on strategic, cross-border mergers and acquisitions and investment transactions for private capital funds, sovereign wealth funds and multinational corporations.

She was most recently a Senior Consultant (Principal Associate) with Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas in Mumbai, where she spent over a year. Prior to that, she worked with Herbert Smith Freehills in London for more than seven years. Earlier in her career, she was an associate with Luthra & Luthra Law Offices in New Delhi.

Her practice spans high-value deals across renewables, natural resources and defence, with matters handled across the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. In India, she has recently advised on landmark investments in the energy and infrastructure sector

On her joining, the firm said "Dishi’s arrival significantly bolsters our Private Equity M&A practice, given her distinctive expertise, legal acumen, technical precision and keen understanding of business priorities. Dishi’s entry underscores our dedication to providing excellent legal services to our trusting clients. We continue to invest in talent acquisition and practice area advancement, ensuring that the firm remains at the forefront of legal innovation and client service."

All retiring Supreme Court judges to be made honorary members of SCBA: President Vikas Singh

Senior Advocate Surojit Nath Mitra appointed new Advocate General of West Bengal

Taking part in protests not ground to deny bail in PMLA case: Delhi High Court

Delhi HC admin says DHCBA plea against judges’ committee on pecuniary jurisdiction is not maintainable

When the court live-streams a draft order: The transparency gap

SCROLL FOR NEXT