Lawyers and Spam Calls 
News

Don't encroach on privacy: Delhi High Court to BCD over lawyers being spammed with Bar election calls, messages

BCD stated that the voter list had to be shared with the candidates and that lawyers' details are already public on various websites.

Prashant Jha

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday expressed displeasure over lawyers’ contact details being made public and allegedly being misused by candidates contesting the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) elections to send unsolicited campaign messages.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia remarked that lawyers’ privacy cannot be encroached in this way and that they are being harassed and spammed.

“This is not the way. You can’t encroach on people’s privacy. Individual lawyers are being harassed without their willingness. They have been included in WhatsApp groups without their consent,” the Bench said. 

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia

The Court made the remark while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an Advocate Shashank Singh, stating that the BCD has made public the photographs, residential addresses and mobile phone numbers of lawyers in its recently updated voter list. 

It was stated that this poses harassment, profiling and security risks to the advocates and that many of them are getting calls and messages from unknown numbers for election canvassing. 

Advocate T Singhdev appeared for the BCD. He stated that the elections are on Saturday and that the canvassing will soon come to an end. He said that details about the voter list had to be given to the 121 candidates contesting the BCD elections for canvassing. Singhdev added that lawyers’ details are easily available on various websites. 

However, the Bench said that the BCD must protect the privacy of the lawyers. 

“You have to protect their right to privacy. You are making every detail public. You have to do something,” Chief Justice Upadhyaya said. 

Ultimately, the Bench issued notice to the BCD, the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the Central government on the PIL and said it would be heard after two weeks. 

Delhi High Court seeks response from police, Central government over disappearance of 807 people

Supreme Court condemns murder of Tripura's Anjel Chakma, violence against North East students

Is ED terrorised or weaponised? Can it file Article 32 petition? Senior lawyers spar in ED vs. West Bengal case

Sabarimala gold theft: Kerala court grants bail to senior Thantri Kandararu Rajeevaru

Supreme Court says no to excessive leniency during sentencing of criminals, lays down guidelines

SCROLL FOR NEXT