Supreme Court 
Litigation News

Supreme Court dismisses petition seeking direction for use of double-sided A4 papers in all courts

The plea filed by the Youth Bar Association of India sought a direction to all high courts, tribunals, judicial and quasi-judicial authorities in India to consider allowing both pages of a paper to be used.

Shagun Suryam

The Supreme Court refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking a direction for the use of double-sided A4 size papers in all judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings [Youth Bar Association of India v Union of India]

The plea was dismissed as withdrawn by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) UU Lalit, Justices Ravindra Bhat and Bela M Trivedi.

The plea filed by the Youth Bar Association of India (YBAI) sought a direction to all high courts, tribunals, judicial and quasi-judicial authorities in India to consider altering their rules to allow both pages of a paper to be used.

"Use of single side of papers of different sizes in different forums prompts wastage of it and aggravate the users and manufacturers to abuse resources that are non-renewable", the petition argued.

Therefore, the plea said that it was high timed to ponder the issue with an aim of achieving environmental sustainability.

In this regard, the PIL shed light on the right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. It was stated that judicial pronouncements had extended the scope of the term "life" to include the right to health.

"Thus, it could be stated that Article 21 has a multidimensional interpretation."

It was also pointed out that the top court, in March 2020, allowed the use of A4 size paper, on both sides, to cope with environmental challenges. However, most High Courts had not considered taking the same step.

"It is sine qua non that High Courts and subordinate judicial bodies should take part in this greater cause of saving the earth", the plea had urged.

Advocates Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Yaksha Sharma, Varun Mishra, Bhavya Pratap Singh, Seema Dhngra, and Manju Jetley appeared for the petitioners.

Pertinently, the decision of the Apex Court to shift all judicial filings from legal paper to A4 size paper with printing allowed on both sides saved approximately 3 crore paper sheets in two years.

Besides, reducing the margin and line spacing requirements and bringing down the copies of petitions required from 4 to 2 have also contributed to the saving more than 50 lakh pages a year.

High Courts that have also moved from legal to A4 size paper for filings include the High Courts of CalcuttaTripuraKeralaDelhiAllahabad, and Bombay.

[Read Order]

Youth Bar Association of India v Union of India.pdf
Preview

We would be mad not to take advantage of the Indian market liberalisation: Stephen Moriarty KC

Win for PVR, BookMyShow as Bombay High Court allows convenience fees on online movie tickets

Delhi High Court stays release of Udaipur Files movie, directs Centre to take final call on certification

Delhi High Court restrains Kuku FM from streaming 5 shows after Pocket FM alleges IP violation

Rajasthan court summons Drishti IAS founder Vikas Divyakirti for derogatory remarks against judiciary

SCROLL FOR NEXT