ISKCON 
News

Supreme Court delivers split verdict in ISKCON Mumbai’s review plea over Bengaluru temple ownership

While Justice AG Masih dismissed the review petitions, Justice JK Maheshwari allowed them.

Ritwik Choudhury

The Supreme Court recently delivered a split verdict on a batch of review petitions filed by ISKCON Mumbai seeking reconsideration of the Court’s May 2025 ruling that recognised ISKCON Bangalore as an independent legal entity and owner of the Hare Krishna Temple in Bengaluru [ISKCON Mumbai vs. ISKCON Bangalore & Ors.].

While Justice JK Maheshwari allowed the review petitions and listed them for further hearing, Justice AG Masih dismissed them.

Notably, Justice Masih was part of the original bench led by Justice Abhay S Oka that had passed the verdict in ISKCON Bangalore's favour.

Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice AG Masih

The May 16 verdict had ruled that ISKCON Bangalore is a distinct legal entity registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and not a branch of ISKCON Mumbai.

The Court then had upheld the trial court’s finding recognising ISKCON Bangalore’s independent status and ownership of the Hare Krishna Temple in Bengaluru, while setting aside the Karnataka High Court’s 2011 decision that had favoured ISKCON Mumbai.

In view of the differing opinions on the review plea, the matter will now be placed before the Chief Justice of India for appropriate directions.

[Read Judgement]

ISKCON Mumbai vs. ISKCON Bangalore & Ors. .pdf
Preview

Ease of justice is as vital as ease of doing business and living: PM Narendra Modi

The silent trial of LinkedIn profiles

The rule that broke the student: Attendance, anxiety and what must change

Judiciary has played a stabilising role in India’s economic transformation: CJI BR Gavai

Between citizenship and cyberspace: Reading the X Corp judgment with constitutional calm

SCROLL FOR NEXT