A list of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of BiharSabu Matthew George v. Union of IndiaAmit Sibal v. Arvind Kejriwal & Ors.Compassion Unlimited Plus Action v. Union Of India And OrsManohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India.Delhi High Court.Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Advertising Standards Council of IndiaIndian National Trust for Art and Heritage (INTACH) Delhi Chapter and Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar.[Item 701 in court 1 – CA 5875/1994].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, Madan B Lokur, SA Bobde, AK Goel, UU Lalit, DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao JJ..Case concerning the constitutional validity of an ordinance after it lapses. Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi made his submissions on the last hearing..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Any updates are welcome..2. Sabu Matthew George v. Union of India.[Item 3 in court 4 – WP(C) 341/2008].Bench: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy JJ..Case regarding advertisements posted on various websites in violation of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994..Today in Court: The Bench directed the Centre to set up a nodal agency to address complaints of pre-natal sex determinations advertisements..Read full story here..3. Amit Sibal v. Arvind Kejriwal & Ors..[Item 5 in court 9 – SLP (Crl) 1306/2014].Bench: AK Sikri, R Banumathi JJ..An appeal against the Delhi High Court order in the defamation case filed by Senior Advocate Amit Sibal against Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP leaders for their comments that Sibal had misused his father’s ministerial position to represent telecom companies..Today in Court: This matter did not come up today..4. Compassion Unlimited Plus Action v. Union Of India And Ors.[Item 301 in court 4 – WP(C) 24/2016].Bench: Dipak Misra, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..Case relating to Jallikattu. The case challenges the Centre’s notification exempting Jallikattu from the exhibition or training of animals. The Court had stayed the notification on January 12 this year..Today in Court: The Court today dismissed Tamil Nadu’s review petition over the Jallikattu ban, and held that the sport was an inherently cruel activity and could not be allowed..5. Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 8 in court 9 – Writ Petition (Civil) 121/2013].Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, R Banumathi JJ. .A petition seeking a probe into supply of adulterated drugs by drug manufacturers like Ranbaxy. The court had issued notice in this case on March 14, 2014..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Updates welcome..6. Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India.[Item 1 in court 4 – WP(C) 116/1998].Bench: Justice Dipak Mishra, Amitava Roy JJ..A Public Interest Litigation, filed by the Sunanda Bhandare Foundation for the implementation of the provisions of the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Updates welcome.. Delhi High Court.1. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Advertising Standards Council of India.[C.S. (OS) 458/2016; Court No. 21 Item No. 15].Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw J..Suit against the Advertising Standards Council of India in regard to the nationwide broadcast of an advertisement..During the last hearing, the defendant had argued against the jurisdiction of the court along with the maintainability of the suit. The bench granted time to the parties to refer to judgments of the court on the two issues and listed the matter for today..Today in Court: The matter was deleted from the causelist..2. Indian National Trust for Art and Heritage (INTACH) Delhi Chapter and Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors..[W.P. (C) 4302/2015; Court No. 3 Item No. 12].Bench: Badar Durrez Ahmed, Ashutosh Kumar, JJ..An NGO has alleged the “complete abdication” of responsibility by Heritage Conservation Committee and the Delhi Urban Art Commission to protect the city’s contemporary architectural heritage..Justice Manmohan had asked the HCC and DUAC to produce the original files which contain the decisions of the two bodies on the issue which has been raised in the plea filed by INTACH..Today in Court: The bench asked the SDM responsible for the demarcation of the Mehrauli Archaeological Park to present his report on Monday and be present in court.
A list of important cases from the causelists of the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court..TABLE OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of BiharSabu Matthew George v. Union of IndiaAmit Sibal v. Arvind Kejriwal & Ors.Compassion Unlimited Plus Action v. Union Of India And OrsManohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India.Delhi High Court.Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Advertising Standards Council of IndiaIndian National Trust for Art and Heritage (INTACH) Delhi Chapter and Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors..SUMMARY OF CASES.Supreme Court of India.1. Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar.[Item 701 in court 1 – CA 5875/1994].Bench: Chief Justice TS Thakur, Madan B Lokur, SA Bobde, AK Goel, UU Lalit, DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao JJ..Case concerning the constitutional validity of an ordinance after it lapses. Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi made his submissions on the last hearing..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Any updates are welcome..2. Sabu Matthew George v. Union of India.[Item 3 in court 4 – WP(C) 341/2008].Bench: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy JJ..Case regarding advertisements posted on various websites in violation of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994..Today in Court: The Bench directed the Centre to set up a nodal agency to address complaints of pre-natal sex determinations advertisements..Read full story here..3. Amit Sibal v. Arvind Kejriwal & Ors..[Item 5 in court 9 – SLP (Crl) 1306/2014].Bench: AK Sikri, R Banumathi JJ..An appeal against the Delhi High Court order in the defamation case filed by Senior Advocate Amit Sibal against Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP leaders for their comments that Sibal had misused his father’s ministerial position to represent telecom companies..Today in Court: This matter did not come up today..4. Compassion Unlimited Plus Action v. Union Of India And Ors.[Item 301 in court 4 – WP(C) 24/2016].Bench: Dipak Misra, Rohinton Fali Nariman JJ..Case relating to Jallikattu. The case challenges the Centre’s notification exempting Jallikattu from the exhibition or training of animals. The Court had stayed the notification on January 12 this year..Today in Court: The Court today dismissed Tamil Nadu’s review petition over the Jallikattu ban, and held that the sport was an inherently cruel activity and could not be allowed..5. Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 8 in court 9 – Writ Petition (Civil) 121/2013].Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, R Banumathi JJ. .A petition seeking a probe into supply of adulterated drugs by drug manufacturers like Ranbaxy. The court had issued notice in this case on March 14, 2014..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Updates welcome..6. Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India.[Item 1 in court 4 – WP(C) 116/1998].Bench: Justice Dipak Mishra, Amitava Roy JJ..A Public Interest Litigation, filed by the Sunanda Bhandare Foundation for the implementation of the provisions of the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995..Today in Court: This matter could not be tracked. Updates welcome.. Delhi High Court.1. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Advertising Standards Council of India.[C.S. (OS) 458/2016; Court No. 21 Item No. 15].Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw J..Suit against the Advertising Standards Council of India in regard to the nationwide broadcast of an advertisement..During the last hearing, the defendant had argued against the jurisdiction of the court along with the maintainability of the suit. The bench granted time to the parties to refer to judgments of the court on the two issues and listed the matter for today..Today in Court: The matter was deleted from the causelist..2. Indian National Trust for Art and Heritage (INTACH) Delhi Chapter and Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority and Ors..[W.P. (C) 4302/2015; Court No. 3 Item No. 12].Bench: Badar Durrez Ahmed, Ashutosh Kumar, JJ..An NGO has alleged the “complete abdication” of responsibility by Heritage Conservation Committee and the Delhi Urban Art Commission to protect the city’s contemporary architectural heritage..Justice Manmohan had asked the HCC and DUAC to produce the original files which contain the decisions of the two bodies on the issue which has been raised in the plea filed by INTACH..Today in Court: The bench asked the SDM responsible for the demarcation of the Mehrauli Archaeological Park to present his report on Monday and be present in court.