Hurried trial: Delhi High Court sets aside ex-Army officer's conviction in disproportionate assets case

Justice Jasmeet Singh ruled that the trial against Kapur was hurried and that he did not get a fair opportunity to prove his case.
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court
Published on
2 min read

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday set aside the conviction of retired Major General Anand Kumar Kapur in a disproportionate assets case. 

Justice Jasmeet Singh ruled that the trial against Kapur was hurried and that he did not get a fair opportunity to prove his case.

The Court said that the sanction for Kapur’s prosecution also suffered from "non-application of mind".

“In view of the findings recorded above that the Appellant [Kapur] was denied a fair opportunity to lead evidence and that the sanction order is invalid, the present appeals deserve to be allowed on these grounds alone,” the Court ruled.

Justice Jasmeet Singh
Justice Jasmeet Singh

Kapur was accused by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) of having amassed assets disproportionate to his known sources of income during his service in the Indian Army. 

In 2016, a trial court convicted him under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced him to one year of rigorous imprisonment, a fine of ₹50,000 and also ordered confiscation of assets worth ₹2.22 crore.

Before the High Court, Kapur argued that the investigation was flawed, the prosecution sanction was invalid and that he was denied a fair trial after the trial court closed his defence evidence when lawyers were on strike. 

He contended that only four of his nine defence witnesses had been examined before the opportunity to lead further evidence was withdrawn.

The CBI defended the conviction, maintaining that sufficient opportunity was provided to the accused and that the trial court was acting in compliance with the Supreme Court’s direction to conclude the proceedings by September 2016. 

However, Justice Singh said that while the trial court’s anxiety to comply with the Supreme Court’s directions was understandable and justified, procedural timelines cannot eclipse the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court emphasised that corruption allegations against public servants are serious and must be dealt with firmly. Still, convictions can only follow a trial that fully safeguards the accused’s right to present a defence.

Senior Advocate Vivek Kohli with advocates Shashank Dewan, Nikita Dewan, Ayush Kumar and Manan Kesar appeared for Anand Kumar Kapur. 

Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Rajesh Kumar and advocate Changez Khan represented the CBI. 

Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com