ED abused powers against free journalism: Delhi HC quashes PMLA case against NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha

The Court quashed the FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) and the consequential money laundering proceedings initiated by ED.
NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha and Delhi High Court
NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha and Delhi High Court
Published on
2 min read
Listen to this article

The action of Enforcement Directorate (ED) against independent digital news media company NewsClick and its founder Prabir Purkayastha in relation to a foreign direct investment (FDI) case amounted to an abuse of power against free and impartial journalism, the Delhi High Court recently held while quashing the money laundering case against the news portal.

In a judgment passed on May 29, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna quashed the FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) and the consequential money laundering proceedings initiated by ED.

"Not only are the present proceedings only mala fide, but also an arbitrary attack and abuse of powers on the free and impartial journalism of the petitioners," the Court stated.

The Court further observed that ED's allegation that a scheduled offence exists was "totally misconceived and baseless".

"Pertinently, extensive investigations have been carried out by ED for about a year and a half and petitioners as well as its employees have been summoned and examined many a times, but nothing incriminating till date has been found or placed on record. Aside from bald assertions of there being a criminal conspiracy, there is not a whisper of any incriminating allegation, which would even remotely suggest the commission of the offence punishable under Section 4 PMLA."

The Court observed that ED conducted a fishing and roving exercise on the news company.

"The manner in which the investigations have been conducted clearly show that the same is a fishing and roving exercise in the financial affairs of the Petitioners without the existence of any offence."

While quashing the FIR registered by the EOW, the Court stated that the continuation of such FIR was nothing but a gross abuse of the process of law.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna

The money laundering case stemmed from an investment received from a US-based company M/s Worldwide Media Holdings LLC which was allegedly non-existent.

In February 2021, the ED had raided the homes and offices of the NewsClick founder and employees. The raids lasted for more than four days whilst Purkayastha was detained at home.

Among the allegations made against NewsClick were overvaluing of shares, diverting funds and violation of foreign direct investment (FDI) regulations.

Not only are the present proceedings only mala fide but also an arbitrary attack and abuse of powers on the free and impartial journalism of the petitioners.
Delhi High Court

Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Dayan Krishnan with advocates Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Harsh Srivastava, Sidak Singh Anand, Shreedhar Kale, Nikhil Pawar and Peeyush Bhatia appeared for Purkayastha. 

Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain, Panel Counsel Vivek Gurnani and advocates Kanishk Maurya, Harik Sabharwal, Pranjal Tripathi, Kunal Kochar and Siddharth Kumar appeared for ED.

This is a developing story.

[Read Judgment]

Attachment
PDF
M:s PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of Nct Of Delhi
Preview
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com