Judges working round the clock, such petitions demoralising: Gujarat High Court imposes ₹1 lakh costs on lawyer for PIL challenging roster

The petitioner had submitted that the right to early hearing and speedy justice was being affected by virtue of later litigations being taken up, before earlier cases were decided.
Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri
Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri

The Gujarat High Court on Friday refused to reconsider the costs of ₹1 lakh imposed on a lawyer for filing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition challenging the court's roster/sitting list [Bipin Prataprai Bhatt v The Registrar General].

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com