Observation that arrest of Tablighi members was "indirect warning to Indian Muslims" beyond scope of case: Justice MG Sewlikar of Bombay HC

Justice Sewlikar, however, concurred with Justice Nalawade's conclusion that the FIRs registered in the matter ought to be quashed.
Tablighi jamaat
Tablighi jamaat

A judgment concerning FIRs registered against 35 persons for their participation in the Nizamuddin Markaz amid the COVID-19 pandemic recently saw two Judges of the Bombay High Court differ in their reasoning to some extent on why the FIRs ought to be set aside.

Justice TV Nalawade had made strong observations slamming the Government over the episode, remarking that the FIRs and arrests were an indirect warning to Indian Muslims in the backdrop of Anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests.

Also Read
Arrest of Tablighis indirectly gave warning to Indian Muslims that action in any form and for anything can be taken against them: Bombay HC

At the time of pronouncing the judgment, Justice MG Sewlikar had expressed that he does not agree with Justice Nalawade's reasoning to some extent, on which count he would issue a separate judgment.

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news