Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Bar and Bench
The Viewpoint: Claims not part of approved Resolution Plan do not survive
Call for Papers: Insolvency & Bankruptcy Restructured- Rolling Submissions (Submit by July 17)
Crown debts which are not part of Resolution Plan under IBC cannot be enforced: Karnataka High Court
[Breaking] Supreme Court upholds provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on insolvency of personal guarantors
Resignation of directors during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
High Courts cannot exercise Section 482 powers to undermine statutory dictate under Sections 14, 17 of IBC: Supreme Court [READ JUDGMENT]
All claims not part of resolution plan get extinguished on approval of resolution plan by Adjudicating Authority under S. 31 IBC: Supreme Court
Are disputes arbitrable after Section 7 IBC petition is filed? Supreme Court answers [Read Judgment]
Action under Section 7 IBC will lie against guarantor which is a corporate person though principal borrower is not a corporate person: SC
[Jaypee Infra] NCLT has limited jurisdiction in approval of resolution plan under IBC, cannot interfere with commercial aspects: Supreme Court
Securing Unsecured Creditors in Arbitrations – An IBC Perspective
Person ineligible to submit resolution plan under Section 29A of IBC barred from proposing a scheme under Section 230 of Companies Act: SC
Till payment is received in one, lender's claim maintainable in CIRP against both Principal Borrower, Corporate Guarantor: NCLAT
NCLT has jurisdiction over contractual disputes that arise solely on ground of insolvency: Supreme Court
Would a moratorium imposed under IBC bar Consumer Court proceedings against erstwhile company directors? Supreme Court to examine
Load More
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com