Negotiable Instruments Act

Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act 'directory' not 'mandatory': Delhi High Court
[Section 138 NI Act] Accused can be summoned on the basis of affidavit by complainant: Allahabad High Court
No fundamental defect if company’s name not mentioned first when suing through Managing Director: Supreme Court
Cheque issued pursuant to settlement agreement presumed to be for discharge of debt: Supreme Court
[Cheque bounce cases] When can company Directors be summoned? Supreme Court explains
Gravity of complaint under Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be equated with IPC offences: Supreme Court
Delhi High Court notifies practice directions for speedy trial of cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
Service of notice via registered post sufficient under Section 138 NI Act; no mandate to serve notice under certificate of posting: Karnataka HC
Supreme Court forms committee headed by retired Justice RC Chavan to devise steps to expedite disposal of cases under Section 138 NI Act
Under Negotiable Instruments Act, burden of proof on accused to prove cheque was not issued for discharge of debt or liability: Supreme Court
No joint liability under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act unless the account on which cheque was drawn is jointly maintained: Supreme Court
"Negotiable Instruments Act cases account for 30 to 40 percent trial court pendency:" Supreme Court, Centre mooting committee to devise solution
Moratorium order under Section 14 IBC bars parallel proceedings against Corporate Debtor under Section 138 of NI Act: Supreme Court
Payee need not wait for 15 days to file complaint under S. 138 of NI Act if intention of drawer to not make payment is clear: Allahabad HC
Suo motu case on Cheque Bouncing: Supreme Court seeks reply of all High Courts on amicus curiae preliminary report
Load More
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com