How to (NOT) get away with Deepfakes – Patents lead the way

The article discusses the current state of deepfake regulation across media with reference to data on patents of deepfake technology as well as patents of deepfake detection and regulation technology.
SS Rana & Co - Vikrant Rana, Pranit Biswas
SS Rana & Co - Vikrant Rana, Pranit Biswas

Rashmika Mandanna. Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Morgan Freeman. Donald Trump. Politics. Celebrities. War. Terror. Pornography. Where does the buck stop? Can it be controlled or regulated, if not stopped? These are probably the most common questions surrounding deepfakes in the last few weeks. While the concept and existence of deepfakes are hardly new, the recent furore over the damage that can be caused by deepfakes was inevitable in this day and age, especially with the coming elections in major economies like the United States of America and India, the ongoing conflict in Palestine and Israel, the never-ending conflict in Ukraine, etc.

While there are indeed governmental regulations being put in place in India to tackle this ever-growing issue (as covered in our article accessible here), and there have been notable attempts by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to crack down on the same (as covered in our article accessible here), the focus is now being shifted to how deepfakes can be detected and what can realistically be done by platforms (especially social media) which are the most popular and effective way of disseminating deepfakes. Of late, quite a few leading tech companies have released statements about what is being done to move in this direction, in addition to laying down seemingly reasonable expectations for regulating the dissemination of deepfakes. For instance, as reported by the Economic Times (ET) on December 1:

  • Google and Meta are likely to take more time to develop tools to accurately detect and take down deepfake and synthetic content;

  • Dependency on manual flagging of such content, and virality and traction of such content;

  • Google recently announcing that it will allow users to request the removal of AI-generated or other synthetic or altered content that simulates an identifiable individual; etc.

The main takeaway from such statements is the requirement of time, as well as dependency on manual flagging and traction. As such, these statements do not instill much confidence regarding whether there are active methods under development or already in existence, to regulate deepfakes on social media.

Digging deep – looking beyond the obvious

Therefore, it is important to look beyond the obvious being reported in social media and news platforms and the best way to examine this conundrum is to monitor the actual scientific developments in this direction. One of the best ways to get a better picture regarding solutions to the deepfake question is to analyse patents.

As a whole, there have been a significant number of patents filed worldwide till date, which prima facie encompass elements related to deepfakes (based on a search for keywords such as ‘Deepfake’, ‘Synthetic media’, ‘Face Swapping’, ‘Neural D Network’, ‘4D Manipulation’, ‘Digital D impersonation’, Facial D Re-enactment, etc. on publicly available databases). A study in this regard reveals that the USA, China and Korea are the world leaders in such patents. For instance, till date, at least 1059 such patents have been filed in the USA:

Patents of Deepfake technology by Protection Country
Patents of Deepfake technology by Protection Country

The above graph reveals that patents with respect to inventions that may encompass deepfakes are being filed in a large number of countries.

In addition to the above, the trend in patent filings with respect to such inventions seem to correspond with the rise in controversies regarding deepfakes which ballooned in 2021-2022, with events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of a bill in the USA to inter alia, counter deepfakes (National Deepfake and Digital Provenance Task Force), the attack on the US Capitol, etc. As such, there was an exponential rise in patent filings for inventions that may encompass deepfakes in 2021-2022:

Further, as per a brief study of a few such patent applications relating to deepfake technology, it has been observed that they in general, they cover three main aspects:

  • Algorithms for detection of deepfakes;

  • Deepfake attack prevention methodologies; and

  • Deepfake forensic analysis.

The fight against deepfakes – Indian contribution

Even though India only features as number 6 globally when it comes to filing of patents with respect to inventions that may encompass deepfakes, the number of patents filed (that is, 119) is certainly not insignificant. In fact, leading Indian companies and universities (in addition to other applicants) have been filing patent applications in this domain in India, including but not limited to the following.

Deepfake detection apps patented by Indian institutions
Deepfake detection apps patented by Indian institutions

The road ahead

While it is undoubtedly true that deepfakes are enjoying a renaissance in the last two or three years, and especially this year with various political and military developments, the world of technology also appears to be trying to keep up and innovate, to counter this resurgence.

In addition to the markers of upcoming technological innovation vis-à-vis detecting and countering deepfakes, over the recent years tech giants like Intel have also come up with software/ tools. Thus, the near future may not be bleak when it comes to detecting and regulating deepfakes!

About the authors: Vikrant Rana is the Managing Partner of SS Rana & Co. Pranit Biswas is a Managing Associate at the firm.

Swaraj Singh Raghuwanshi, Senior Associate (Patents) has assisted in the research of this article.

Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news