Delhi Riots: Supreme Court hears bail pleas by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, others [LIVE UPDATES]

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria is hearing the matter.
Umar Khalid and Supreme Court
Umar Khalid and Supreme Court

ASG Raju continues.

SV Raju: They wanted a high level of violence which people were afraid to indulge in. The second step was destroying CCTV cameras. Rioters attacked people in a planned manner. IB officer was killed. Acid bottles, stones etc were pelted.

Connectivity Restored

Connectivity issue in court. Audio/video feed of court hearing unavailable.

Raju refers to section 2(ea) to show economic security was disrupted. Raju: there was a conspiracy, for the purpose of not only inciting but for the purpose of violence. The conspiracy was to choke Assam out of the country.

Justice Kumar: where do you get that from the chargesheet?

Raju: I have given it in a pen drive. I’ll come back to it. In any case knowing fully well what’s there in the chargesheet they have not made any submissions on merits. They themselves have voluntarily not gone into it.

Raju emphasises on the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ under UAPA and stresses that the activities of the accused fall squarely under the definition given in the statute. Raju: bombs have been used. Petrol bombs. Chicken neck area was attacked. There’s a charge of firearms also. There’s post mortem report to that extent. Milk, water, vegetable stock supply was disrupted. That was also part of the conspiracy.

SV Raju: If there is an application of judicial mind that an offence under UAPA act has been committed there is no question of granting bail. The accusation is prima facie true because cognisance has been taken. That order of cognisance has not been challenged.

ASG Raju reads section 16(1)(a) of the UAPA act.

SV Raju: There’s a chargesheet for section 16 where punishment is for life. The order taking cognisance has not been challenged. An application of judicial mind ensures that an offence has been committed.

SV Raju now points to section 43D(5) of UAPA.

SV Raju: For the chargesheet of 16th September, cognisance was taken on 7.9.2020. There are 7 petitioners here. 5 were there in main chargesheet. Imam and Khalid were there in the first supplementary chargesheet of 22nd Nov, 2020.

ASG SV Raju (for Delhi Police): 53 people killed, more than 530 injured, there was a lot of violence. Petrol bombs were used, stones were pelted, sticks, acid like chemicals were used. Stones were pelted on a small contingent of policemen.

Hearing Starts

The Supreme Court is hearing the bail pleas filed by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shadab Ahmed and Mohd Saleem Khan in the larger conspiracy case in relation to the 2020 North East Delhi riots.

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria is hearing the matter.

Khalid and others moved the top court against the Delhi High Court's September 2 order denying them bail. The top court had issued notice to the police on September 22.

The riots occurred in February 2020 following clashes over the then-proposed Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). As per the Delhi Police, the riots caused the death of 53 persons and injured hundreds.

The present case pertains to allegations that the accused had hatched a larger conspiracy to cause multiple riots. The FIR in this case was registered by a Special Cell of the Delhi Police under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the UAPA.

Most of the accused were booked in multiple FIRs, leading to multiple bail petitions before different courts. Most have been in custody since 2020.

Khalid was arrested in September 2020 and charged with criminal conspiracy, rioting, unlawful assembly, as well as several other offences under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

He has been in jail since then.

The trial court had first denied him bail in March 2022. He then approached the High Court, which also denied him relief in October 2022, prompting him to file an appeal before the top court.

In May 2023, the Supreme Court sought the response of the Delhi Police in the matter. His plea before the top court was then adjourned 14 times.

On February 14, 2024, he withdrew his bail plea from the Supreme Court,  citing a change in circumstances.

On May 28, the trial court rejected his second bail petition. An appeal against the same was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on September 2, prompting the present plea before the apex court.

Imam too was booked in multiple FIRs across several States, mostly under sedition and UAPA charges.

In the case registered over speeches he gave at Jamia Milia Islamia University and Aligarh Muslim University, he was granted bail by the Delhi High Court last year. In the sedition cases registered in Aligarh and Guwahati, he was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court in 2021 and the Gauhati High Court in 2020, respectively. He was also booked in FIRs in Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur.

The Court had earlier pulled up the Delhi Police for failing to file its response to the bail pleas.

Subsequently, the Delhi Police filed a 389-page affidavit detailing why the accused should not be granted bail.

The Delhi Police claimed irrefutable documentary as well as technical evidence that pointed to a conspiracy for a "regime-change operation" and plans to incite nationwide riots on communal lines and kill non-Muslims.

During the hearing of the case on November 20, the Delhi Police told the top court that the accused are anti-nationals who tried to overthrow the regime through violence.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju told the Court that even foreign newspapers carry sympathetic stories about the accused persons without understanding that they are anti-national and not intellectuals.

He claimed that the entire protest by the accused persons against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was aimed at bringing about a change in regime and the riots that followed led to the death of 53 persons including an officer of Intelligence Bureau (IB).

Raju also claimed that it was done in a manner that it coincided with the visit of US President Donald Trump. When intellectuals become terrorists, they are far more dangerous than ground level terrorists, the ASG argued.

Live updates from today's hearing here.

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com