- Apprentice Lawyer
The Delhi High Court has held that an accused under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 has the right to be heard to oppose the extension of detention and the time for completion of the investigation but he/she is not entitled to a copy of the application or the report furnished by the public prosecutor under Section 43D of the Act. (Khalid vs State)
We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.