The Court also ordered the police to ensure that he is put in possession of his house, as it noted that his property may have been grabbed by those who implicated him.
"It is sad that members of the bar, who virtually work like soldiers in times of peace to secure justice for citizens, are hurled with words of criticism from all quarters," the Court said.
"Digital technology is altering the face of crime. Indecent pictures of a person when circulated on public platforms by social media can destroy lives," the Court noted.
His anti-national conduct does not entitle him to seek protection of his right to liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Court said.