Section 124A

Sedition and the Supreme Court's Kedar Nath Singh judgment: Tendency versus proximity
[Sedition] Can't "expect" from government; Supreme Court should have passed detailed, reasoned order: Saurabh Kirpal
Sedition in abeyance: Experts hail Supreme Court order, say democracy doesn't need pre-Constitution laws
Sedition: Is there a blanket stay on cases? Takeaways from the Supreme Court order on Section 124A [READ ORDER]
Sedition challenge: Hearing in Supreme Court [Live Updates]
[Sedition Challenge] What Pandit Nehru could not do, current government is doing: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to Supreme Court
Can sedition cases be kept in abeyance till government completes review of Section 124A: Supreme Court asks Central government
[Sedition challenge] Stay Section 124A if matter is referred to larger bench: Petitioners to Supreme Court
[BREAKING] Sedition challenge: Central government tells Supreme Court it will re-examine Section 124A
[Sedition challenge] Individual instances of misuse not ground to reconsider Kedar Nath Singh: Central government to Supreme Court
Speeches within ambit of Constitution not anti-national: Sharad Pawar to Bhima Koregaon Commission
PIL in Bombay High Court seeks registration of sedition case against Raj Thackeray
Misuse of sedition has been controlled; Judgment in Kedar Nath has to be upheld: Attorney General KK Venugopal to Supreme Court
[BREAKING] Challenge to Sedition law: Central government seeks extension of one week to file reply
Sedition: Central government seeks more time to file response to Section 124A challenge in Supreme Court
Load More
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com