Search Results

Considering how such demolitions were continuing in Uttar Pradesh, the Court said it was essential to frame and answer certain questions of law.

The Court, however, also said that the permission would be needed if such prayer meeting spills over the public road or public property.

“Power to punish is in the domain of judiciary and not with the police,” the Court underscored.

In the order dated January 28, the Court observed that the practice of police encounters, particularly firing at the legs of accused persons, has seemingly become a routine feature.

Existing law may not be substituted by a practice that may be illegally prevalent in Uttar Pradesh, the High Court said.

The Court noted that in the case before it, the husband’s earning capacity had been completely destroyed due to a criminal act committed by the wife’s family.

The Court came to the aid of a first-year undergraduate student who was prevented from appearing in her semester examination because of administrative lapses at the university level.

The Court was dealing with a plea challenging a district minority welfare officer's order for closure of an unrecognised madrasa.

The case concerned comments made by Dixit by which he referred to a TV panelist and activist as a “casanova, lovebird and munafiq" and of “trapping innocent girls through online chatting.”

Sub-standard drugs are a major issue for the health system and, thus, any violations and deviations cannot be ignored, the Court emphasised.

Upadhyay’s appointment follows the recommendation made by the Supreme Court Collegium at its meeting held on September 1, 2025.

The Court transferred the case to Lucknow after noting the complainant's claim that Gandhi's supporters were not allowing the complainant to argue the case in Raebareli court.

The Court found no merit in the allegations of procedural flaws, bias, or lack of authority after reviewing the inquiry and appeal records.

The Court dismissed a petition that challenged the judicial remand of an accused in a case related to fake degrees and marksheets at Monad University.

However, the Court rejected ED's argument that PMLA investigations must continue despite the stay on proceedings of predicate offence.

Raising or chanting devotional calls or proclamations by any person or a crowd is not an offence unless they are maliciously used to intimidate persons belonging to other religions, the Court said.