The Division Bench noted that the CLAT evaluation process had undergone multi-level expert scrutiny and found no demonstrable error warranting judicial interference.
The Court noted that the accused was not named in the original FIR and observed that there was no evidence showing disturbance of public order due to the alleged acts.
The High Court last month refused to quash the case, observing that forced religious conversion allegations among youngsters was particularly disturbing.
Justice Sreedharan's career is marked by a refusal to tolerate executive overreach and clear loyalty to the oath of office rather than to the powers that be that would ensure his progression on the Be ...
The Court had earlier sought an explanation from Uttar Pradesh government for police' failure to write 'Honorable' or 'Mr' before former Union minister Anurag Thakur's name in a First Information Repo ...