Bombay High Court judge Justice Madhav Jamdar found himself under the spotlight this past week after his oral remarks during a politically charged hearing went viral online.
The Bombay High Court has erred in treating the Rule 45 evidence‑affidavit deadline as directory, thereby undermining the statutory mandatory timeline for trademark proceedings.
The “group of companies” doctrine is consent-based and should not override party autonomy, particularly where clear entire-agreement, no third-party-benefit, and no-oral-modification clauses exclude ...
The impact of the Constitution of the United States as well as the Supreme Court of the United States on the constitutional law of India is worth reflecting on.
Of late, a tendency has developed among politicians to deviate from the text of the form prescribed in the Constitution, and they swear in the name of chosen deity, or human beings, or associations or ...
The fundamental flaw is the absence of an institutional home for reform: a body empowered to take a comprehensive, long-term view of judicial transformation.
According to former High Court Justice S Muralidhar, to whom the book is dedicated, quizzing nurtures curiosity and curiosity is vital for any democracy to thrive.
